Letter to the editor: Censorship not the way to prioritize students' well-being

My first Hempfield School Board meeting concerned the policy for challenging school library books. Points from both sides were presented, along with those of a sexual abuse survivor who identified being “triggered” by scenes described in a book.

As a licensed counselor and survivor of sexual assault myself, I am sensitive to that person’s pain. However, the perceived emotional pain of one person cannot be the basis for censoring literature. Painful life experiences abound, which is why mental health care must be prioritized by county commissioners and state legislators. School shootings, not books, should be the focus to prioritize students’ safety and emotional stability.

One board member, Michael Alfery, incensed about images in some books, also stated that he was proud to never have read a book. Why should someone who doesn’t read pass judgment on the availability of books for students?

Suicide is the second leading cause of death among young people, with higher risks among the LGBTQ+ community. The books identified are autobiographical. Adolescence is a critical time in one’s development. Hearing others’ stories can help stave away isolation and mental health risks. Schools must provide students a safe and affirming environment to explore their identities.

Abra Kuniak

Greensburg