Letter to the editor: Catchy names don't help Americans

Amazing how quickly our politicians have learned that it’s not what’s in the many bills they vote on. It’s giving them a catchy name. This automatically sells it to the masses of blind faith followers.

Who can vote against the Save the Puppies Bill even if it contains millions to fund 87,000 new poop-scooping agents to monitor if you are keeping your yard clean and free of puppy waste. (You know … climate safety patrol stuff.)

Remember, if the name sounds good, then the bill is good. Simple. Don’t worry about reading the 1,200 pages. We’ll see what’s in it after it’s passed.

It’s not like something called the Inflation Reduction Act might include $700 billion to fight inflation caused by … you know … overspending.

I’m ready to Build Back Better as long as it does just that! (Whatever that means.) It’s not like it’s going to give billions to rich folks to help buy electric cars, right?

I don’t know about you, but I’m ready to Make America Great Again by Building Back Better, doing things a “For the People Act” might do and any other glorious plans our two parties have for us.

I’m letting my representatives know that I’m 100% in favor of the Electric Planes Will Be Tested by Congresspeople Act. You?

Imagine how many wonderful things our parties could do if they didn’t spend 90% of their time investigating each other, grandstanding for the cameras and sitting around trying to figure out what comes after “trillions.”

Tim Kaczmarek

Natrona Heights