Western Pennsylvania's trusted news source
Appeals court upholds gag order on Trump but narrows restrictions on his speech | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Appeals court upholds gag order on Trump but narrows restrictions on his speech

Associated Press
6847698_web1_6847698-8ad47745df62420fbc196f517ea97438
AP
Republican presidential candidate and former President Donald Trump’s lawyers are arguing that he had a good faith basis to question the outcome of the 2020 election that he lost.
6847698_web1_6847698-bb14ef4cfa664cb28ab34826941231eb
AP
Special counsel Jack Smith speaks to the media about an indictment of former President Donald Trump, Tuesday, Aug. 1, at an office of the Department of Justice in Washington.
6847698_web1_6847698-85c5d3e36a2f4c1e9af5b9a76592bd9d
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts via AP
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, the federal judge overseeing the 2020 election interference case against former President Donald Trump says those involved in the case must not disclose possible jurors’ names as she set rules around conducting research into potential members of the jury.

WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court in Washington on Friday upheld a gag order on former President Donald Trump in his 2020 election interference case but narrowed the restrictions on his speech.

The three-judge panel’s ruling modifies the gag order to allow the Republican 2024 presidential front-runner to make disparaging comments about special counsel Jack Smith.

But the court upheld the ban on public statements “about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses concerning their potential participation in the case.

Trump, who has described the gag order as unconstitutional muzzling of his political speech, could appeal the ruling to the full court or to the Supreme Court.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan imposed the gag order in October, barring Trump from making public statements targeting Smith and other prosecutors, court staff and potential witnesses. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit had lifted the gag order while it considered Trump’s challenge.

Prosecutors have argued the restrictions are necessary to protect the integrity of the case and shield potential witnesses and others involved in the case from harassment and threats inspired by Trump’s incendiary social media posts.

The order has had a whirlwind trajectory through the courts since prosecutors proposed it, citing Trump’s repeated disparagement of the special counsel, the judge overseeing the case and likely witnesses.

Remove the ads from your TribLIVE reading experience but still support the journalists who create the content with TribLIVE Ad-Free.

Get Ad-Free >

Categories: News | U.S./World
";