Western Pennsylvania's trusted news source
Prince Harry back in court for phone hacking hearing finale | TribLIVE.com
Celebrity News

Prince Harry back in court for phone hacking hearing finale

Associated Press
6053105_web1_6053105-fa517b0b87b74f9b817f3ee8bf2750b7
AP
Britain’s Prince Harry arrives at the Royal Courts Of Justice in London, Thursday, March 30.
6053105_web1_6053105-0b336d4a31434ecf97a77e9115c28534
AP
Britain’s Prince Harry arrives at the Royal Courts Of Justice in London, Thursday, March 30. Prince Harry returned to a London court Thursday as his lawyer fought to keep his phone hacking lawsuit alive against the publisher of The Daily Mail.
6053105_web1_6053105-9ed4f260c2ac4ae78ae3b9bfcd46290c
AP
Britain’s Prince Harry arrives at the Royal Courts Of Justice in London, Thursday, March 30.
6053105_web1_6053105-49edb825005240a6baf486a67cb5d596
AP
Britain’s Prince Harry arrives at the Royal Courts Of Justice, in London, Thursday, March 30.
6053105_web1_6053105-5b63665dd7e64818b1561872d1cf9aa7
AP
Britain’s Prince Harry arrives at the Royal Courts Of Justice, in London, Thursday, March 30.
6053105_web1_6053105-dbb58abb0cc24a2781f8dd88789136bb
David Furnish, Elton John’s husband, arrives the Royal Courts Of Justice in London, Wednesday, March 29.

LONDON — Prince Harry returned to a London court Thursday as his lawyer fought to keep his phone hacking lawsuit against a British tabloid publisher alive.

The Duke of Sussex arrived after lunch for the conclusion of a four-day High Court hearing on his invasion of privacy case against the company that publishes The Daily Mail. His presence during three days of the legal wrangling indicates the lawsuit’s importance in the prince’s broader battle against the British press.

Harry, Elton John, actresses Elizabeth Hurley and Sadie Frost are among a group of seven people suing Associated Newspapers Ltd. for allegedly paying private investigators to illegally bug homes and cars and to record phone conversations.

The publisher denied the allegations and has argued that lawsuits based on alleged incidents dating as far back as 1993 should be thrown out because the cases were not filed within a six-year limitation period.

Attorney David Sherborne, who represents Harry and the other famous claimants, argued that the deadline for filing the lawsuits should be extended because the snooping was covert and the publisher concealed evidence of it through denials “likely to lead the claimants off the scent.”

The judge is expected to rule at a later date.

Remove the ads from your TribLIVE reading experience but still support the journalists who create the content with TribLIVE Ad-Free.

Get Ad-Free >

Categories: Celebrity News | News
";